b5media.com

Advertise with us

Enjoying this blog? Check out the rest of the Lifestyles Channel Subscribe to this Feed

Babylune

Toxins in Breast Milk

by kate baggott on April 24th, 2006

A number of women I know have been told by doctors that they shouldn’t breast feed much beyond six months for fear of exposing their babies to the environmental toxins in their breast milk.

According to the Dr. Greene site, “Unless the mother has an extreme exposure to toxins at home, at work, or in the diet, breast milk solidly remains the healthiest choice for most children.”

There are many ways to avoid extra contamination:

  • Where and when organic produce is too expensive, wash your fruit and vegetables with a mild soap and water to remove fertilizers and insecticides off the surface.
  • Try to get someone who isn’t lactating to fill your gas (petrol) tank and avoid gasoline fumes
  • Use natural cleaners such as lemon juice, pine oil and vinegar rather than chemical preparations for housecleaning
  • Don’t eat fish from lakes that are polluted or contaminated, especially in mining country where lakes have been contaminated by mercury.

At the same time, the argument that formula is safer for babies seems to demand acceptance of strange logic. The idea that a 100 to 200 lb (45 to 90kg) human mother might have more toxins in her tissues than a 1000 lb (450kg) cow just doesn’t hold any weight. Especially since the reality of that cow’s life is not a pristine pasture high in the mountains, but is more likely to be a stall in a factory farm where she is routinely fed a number of chemical hormones and antibiotics. Nor does putting the milk from that cow into a metal tank, sending it to a factory and putting it through industrial processing sound intuitively safer from contamination by environmental pollutants.


I am not trying to put Bessie, dairy farmers or formula companies out of work, but could it be that breast-feeding women have challenged their economic agendas?

POSTED IN: Breastfeeding, Nutrition

3 opinions for Toxins in Breast Milk

  • Twocatmommy
    Apr 24, 2006 at 6:42 am

    Yes, that drives me insane. Like I said before about medications and breastfeeding, it’s like when some ignorant doctors (and there are plenty out there) make women believe that formula is better than breastmilk because the child will be exposed to an insignificant amount of medication. It’s doctors covering their own rear-ends and doing the wrong thing for the patient and child. Same thing with this talk of toxins - the wrong motivation - you hit the nail on the head.

  • kbaggott
    Apr 24, 2006 at 11:04 am

    I often wonder if the formula companies sponsor a certain chapter in their text books, or if it’s the literature that comes through the mail slot with the free samples…

  • Babylune - Breastmilk Less Contaminated than Thought
    Feb 15, 2007 at 12:18 pm

    […] In the past, mothers were told not to extend breastfeeding for fear of passing toxins stored in body fat to their infants. While the argument that even an extremely obese woman would have as many contaminants in her body as a 1200 pound cow didn’t hold much weight with many nursing mothers, it was widely believed and prevented many women from nursing as long as they would have preferred. […]

Have an opinion? Leave a comment: